Abstract
The UK’s devolution reforms were built on long-standing practices of differentiated territorial administration in the non-English parts of the UK. With devolution those practices became subject to new democratic processes, transforming territorial administration into territorial politics. The reforms were introduced in a piecemeal basis, lacking an overall conception of the impact of devolution on the UK state, and lacking consideration of how the government of the non-devolved unit of England can, through its size and weight within the UK, impact on and constrain devolved government. The combination of piecemeal reform and the ‘English question’ raises a number of open questions about the coherence and stability of the devolution arrangements, especially at the point when governments run by different parties import partisan considerations into territorial politics.
| Original language | Undefined/Unknown |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 92-108 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | The Political Quarterly |
| Volume | 77 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2007 |
Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)
- devolution
- constitutional change
- Scottish devolution
- Great Britain
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver