The value of stochastic programming in day-ahead and intra-day generation unit commitment

Tim Schulze, Kenneth McKinnon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

The recent expansion of renewable energy supplies has prompted the development of a variety of efficient stochastic optimization models and solution techniques for hydro-thermal scheduling. However, little has been published about the added value of stochastic models over deterministic ones. In the context of day-ahead and intra-day unit commitment under wind uncertainty, we compare two-stage and multi-stage stochastic models to deterministic ones and quantify their added value. We present a modification of the WILMAR scenario generation technique designed to match the properties of the errors in our wind forecasts, and show that this is needed to make the stochastic approach worthwhile. Our evaluation is done in a rolling horizon fashion over the course of two years, using a 2020 central scheduling model based on the British power system, with transmission constraints and a detailed model of pump storage operation and system-wide reserve and response provision. We show that in day-ahead scheduling the stochastic approach saves 0.3% of generation costs compared to the best deterministic approach, but the savings are less in intra-day scheduling.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)592-605
Number of pages14
Early online date31 Mar 2016
Publication statusPublished - 15 Apr 2016


Dive into the research topics of 'The value of stochastic programming in day-ahead and intra-day generation unit commitment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this