TY - JOUR
T1 - The worst and the best
T2 - New insights into risk and resilience in young adults from the COVID-19 pandemic
AU - Shanahan, Lilly
AU - Johnson Ferguson, Lydia
AU - Loher, Michelle
AU - Steinhoff, Annekatrin
AU - Bechtiger, Laura
AU - Murray, Aja Louise
AU - Hepp, Urs
AU - Ribeaud, Denis
AU - Eisner, Manuel
N1 - Acknowledgements and funding statement: We are grateful to the young people who provided data for this study and to the fieldwork staff involved in the data collection. This analysis was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) grant #10531C_189008. The research reported in this manuscript was also financially supported by the SNSF as a research infrastructure (Grants #10FI14_170402/1; #10FI14_170402/2, #10FI14_198052), by the Jacobs Center for Productive Youth Development, and by the Jacobs Foundation (JF). The Zurich Project on the Social Development from Childhood to Adulthood is a long-term study initially set up by ME and DR. Earlier phases of the study (2003–2016) were funded by the SNF, the JF, the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health, the Department of Education of the Canton of Zurich, the Swiss State Secretariat of Migration and its predecessors, the Julius Bär Foundation, and the Visana Plus Foundation. Open access funding provided by University of Zurich.
PY - 2023/9
Y1 - 2023/9
N2 - Historic declines in young people’s mental health began to emerge before the COVID-19 pandemic. In the face of this youth mental health crisis, the pandemic constituted a naturalistic stressor paradigm that came with the potential to uncover new knowledge for the science of risk and resilience. Surprisingly, approximately 19-35% of people reported better well-being in the first few months of the COVID-19 pandemic than before. Therefore, in May and September 2020, we asked N=517 young adults from a cohort study to describe the best and the worst aspects of their pandemic lives (N=1,462 descriptions). Inductive thematic analysis revealed that the best aspects included the deceleration of life and a greater abundance of free time, which was used for hobbies, healthy activities, strengthening relationships, and for personal growth and building resilience skills. Positive aspects also included a reduction in educational pressures and work load and temporary relief from climate change concerns. The worst aspects included disruptions and changes to daily life; social distancing and restrictions of freedoms; negative emotions that arose in the pandemic situation, including uncertainty about the future; and the growing polarization of society. Science that aims to reverse the youth mental health crisis must pay increased attention to sources of young people’s distress that are not commonly measured (e.g., their educational, work, and time pressures; their fears and uncertainties about their personal, society’s, and the global future), and also to previously untapped sources of well-being – including those that young people identified for themselves while facing the COVID-19 pandemic.
AB - Historic declines in young people’s mental health began to emerge before the COVID-19 pandemic. In the face of this youth mental health crisis, the pandemic constituted a naturalistic stressor paradigm that came with the potential to uncover new knowledge for the science of risk and resilience. Surprisingly, approximately 19-35% of people reported better well-being in the first few months of the COVID-19 pandemic than before. Therefore, in May and September 2020, we asked N=517 young adults from a cohort study to describe the best and the worst aspects of their pandemic lives (N=1,462 descriptions). Inductive thematic analysis revealed that the best aspects included the deceleration of life and a greater abundance of free time, which was used for hobbies, healthy activities, strengthening relationships, and for personal growth and building resilience skills. Positive aspects also included a reduction in educational pressures and work load and temporary relief from climate change concerns. The worst aspects included disruptions and changes to daily life; social distancing and restrictions of freedoms; negative emotions that arose in the pandemic situation, including uncertainty about the future; and the growing polarization of society. Science that aims to reverse the youth mental health crisis must pay increased attention to sources of young people’s distress that are not commonly measured (e.g., their educational, work, and time pressures; their fears and uncertainties about their personal, society’s, and the global future), and also to previously untapped sources of well-being – including those that young people identified for themselves while facing the COVID-19 pandemic.
KW - COVID-19
KW - protective factors
KW - risk
KW - resilience
KW - young adulthood
U2 - 10.1007/s42844-023-00096-y
DO - 10.1007/s42844-023-00096-y
M3 - Article
SN - 2662-2416
VL - 4
SP - 291
EP - 305
JO - Adversity and Resilience Science
JF - Adversity and Resilience Science
IS - 3
ER -