TY - JOUR
T1 - Time-efficient Surrogate Models of Thermal Modeling in Laser Powder Bed Fusion
AU - Li, Xiaohan
AU - Polydorides, Nick
N1 - Funding Information:
We are grateful to the Principal’s Career Development and Edinburgh Global Research Scholarship from the School of Engineering at the University of Edinburgh, UK for sponsoring this research. For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s)
PY - 2022/11
Y1 - 2022/11
N2 - Two time-efficient surrogate models are proposed to emulate the nonlinear heat equation in the context of laser powder bed fusion, the performance of which is compared in accuracy and online execution time. Fast-computed numerical solvers are critical in implementing the digital twin framework in the additive manufacturing process addressing one of its main open problems: lack of quality assurance. The first surrogate model is the reduced Gaussian process emulator. It is a data-driven model equipped with a nonlinear dimension reduction scheme and manages to predict temperature profiles almost instantly (around 0.036s on average) with an accuracy of 95\% for 99.38\% of tests. Another surrogate model is the sketched emulator with local projection. It projects the accurate but high-dimensional finite element method solution on a low-dimensional basis and then bypasses the majority of costly computations for the temperature-dependent matrices in the projected model by randomized sketching. It has higher accuracy (97.78\% of tests with relative errors below 1\%) while spending comparably more time online (around 42.23s on average). Although compared with the finite element model both surrogates promote time efficiency with some minor controlled compromise in accuracy, the reduced Gaussian process emulator enables real-time implementation while the sketched emulator with local projection offers comparably higher levels of accuracy. A series of numerical experiments are carried out, which assumes a three-layer printing process with a fixed laser beam trajectory using a small number of printing control parameters as inputs, namely the laser power, scan speed, and time coordinates. Both surrogates are also principally feasible in other thermal-driven additive manufacturing to obtain better quality assurance with techniques like uncertainty management and closed-loop control.
AB - Two time-efficient surrogate models are proposed to emulate the nonlinear heat equation in the context of laser powder bed fusion, the performance of which is compared in accuracy and online execution time. Fast-computed numerical solvers are critical in implementing the digital twin framework in the additive manufacturing process addressing one of its main open problems: lack of quality assurance. The first surrogate model is the reduced Gaussian process emulator. It is a data-driven model equipped with a nonlinear dimension reduction scheme and manages to predict temperature profiles almost instantly (around 0.036s on average) with an accuracy of 95\% for 99.38\% of tests. Another surrogate model is the sketched emulator with local projection. It projects the accurate but high-dimensional finite element method solution on a low-dimensional basis and then bypasses the majority of costly computations for the temperature-dependent matrices in the projected model by randomized sketching. It has higher accuracy (97.78\% of tests with relative errors below 1\%) while spending comparably more time online (around 42.23s on average). Although compared with the finite element model both surrogates promote time efficiency with some minor controlled compromise in accuracy, the reduced Gaussian process emulator enables real-time implementation while the sketched emulator with local projection offers comparably higher levels of accuracy. A series of numerical experiments are carried out, which assumes a three-layer printing process with a fixed laser beam trajectory using a small number of printing control parameters as inputs, namely the laser power, scan speed, and time coordinates. Both surrogates are also principally feasible in other thermal-driven additive manufacturing to obtain better quality assurance with techniques like uncertainty management and closed-loop control.
KW - Finite element method
KW - Gaussian process emulator
KW - Model order reduction
KW - Randomized sketching
KW - Transient thermal model
U2 - 10.1016/j.addma.2022.103122
DO - 10.1016/j.addma.2022.103122
M3 - Article
SN - 2214-7810
VL - 59
JO - Additive Manufacturing
JF - Additive Manufacturing
M1 - 103122
ER -