Time for a systematic review: A response to Bassett and Fogelman’s “Déjà vu or something new? The adaptation concept in the climate change literature”

Susanne Lorenz, Rachel Berman, Jami Dixon, Sarah Lebel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This critical review debates the issues raised in Bassett and Fogelman’s 2013 article “Déjà vu or something new? The adaptation concept in the climate change literature”. After summarising the main findings of their article, we examine the methodology that Bassett and Fogelman adopted. We question the narrow sample of journals analysed, which we argue has led to a bias in the conclusions drawn. We use this opportunity to draw attention to the use of systematic literature reviews as an important methodological approach to synthesise the climate change adaptation literature. To demonstrate this we discuss the use of an alternate method more akin to that of a systematic literature review, and highlight where differences between this and the originally proposed methodology exist, and what this means for the concluding results.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)252-255
Number of pages4
JournalGeoforum
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Adaptation
  • Systematic review
  • Climate change
  • Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Time for a systematic review: A response to Bassett and Fogelman’s “Déjà vu or something new? The adaptation concept in the climate change literature”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this