To Irritate or to Rescind: Two Paths for the Landlord?

Martin Hogg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

This article considers the two routes open to a landlord faced with a material breach of lease by the tenant, rescission for material breach or irritancy of the lease. (The discussion in the article was referred to approvingly in the judgment of Lord Pentland in Crieff Highland Gathering Ltd v. Perth and Kinross Council [2011] CSOH 78.)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-6
Number of pages6
JournalScots Law Times
Publication statusPublished - 1999

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • lease - material breach - rescission - irritancy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'To Irritate or to Rescind: Two Paths for the Landlord?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this