Abstract / Description of output
The paper seeks to contribute to the transitional justice literature by overcoming the Democracy v. Justice debate. This debate is normatively implausible and prudentially self-defeating. Normatively, transitional justice will be conceptualised as an imperative of democratic equal concern. Prudentially, it can prevent further violence and provide an opportunity for initiating processes of democratic emotional socialisation. The resentment and indignation animating transitions should be acknowledged as markers of a sense of justice. As such, they can help the reproduction of democracy. However, their public expression must be institutionally filtered through democratic norms. The consistent institutional instantiation of equal respect can educate and recuperate negative emotions for democracy.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 183–204 |
Journal | Ratio Juris: An international journal of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law |
Volume | 23 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 17 May 2010 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jun 2010 |