Transitional Justice and the Quest for Democracy: A Contribution to a Political Theory of Democratic Transformations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

The paper seeks to contribute to the transitional justice literature by overcoming the Democracy v. Justice debate. This debate is normatively implausible and prudentially self-defeating. Normatively, transitional justice will be conceptualised as an imperative of democratic equal concern. Prudentially, it can prevent further violence and provide an opportunity for initiating processes of democratic emotional socialisation. The resentment and indignation animating transitions should be acknowledged as markers of a sense of justice. As such, they can help the reproduction of democracy. However, their public expression must be institutionally filtered through democratic norms. The consistent institutional instantiation of equal respect can educate and recuperate negative emotions for democracy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)183–204
JournalRatio Juris: An international journal of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law
Volume23
Issue number2
Early online date17 May 2010
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Transitional Justice and the Quest for Democracy: A Contribution to a Political Theory of Democratic Transformations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this