Trust, reliance and the participant stance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

It is common to think of the attitude of trust as involving reliance of some sort. For example, Annette Baier (1986) argues that trust is reliance on the good will of others, and Richard Holton (1994) argues that trust is reliance from a participant stance. However, it is puzzling how trust could involve reliance, because reliance, unlike trust, is responsive to practical reasons: we rely in light of reasons that show it worthwhile to rely, but we don’t trust in light of reasons that show it worthwhile to trust. To address the puzzle, I sketch an account of reliance, according to which reliance consists in action, and I sketch an account of trust, according to which trust consists in belief held from a participant stance. I conclude that it is plausible to see trust as the grounds for reliance.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-10
JournalPhilosophers Imprint
Volume17
Issue number17
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Trust, reliance and the participant stance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this