The research team explored UK trainee sport psychologists’ perspectives on developing professional judgment and decision-making (PJDM) expertise during their British Psychological Society (BPS) Qualification in Sport and Exercise Psychology (QSEP; Stage 2). An assorted analysis approach was adopted to combine an existing longitudinal qualitative data set with the collection and analysis of a new qualitative data set. Participants (female, n = 1; and male, n = 6) were interviewed 4 times over a 3-year training period, at minimum yearly intervals. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and reflexive thematic analysis applied to transcripts using the theoretical concepts of PJDM. Experience, analytical reasoning, and observation of other practitioners’ practice was useful for developing PJDM expertise. PJDM expertise might be optimised through the use of knowledge elicitation principles. For example, supervisors could embed critical cues within the anecdotes they share to expand the experience base that trainees can draw from when making decisions.
|Number of pages||34|
|Journal||The Sport Psychologist|
|Early online date||1 Apr 2019|
|Publication status||Published - 1 Dec 2019|
- professional training
FingerprintDive into the research topics of 'UK trainee sport and exercise psychologists’ perspectives on developing professional judgement and decision-making expertise during training'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
- Moray House School of Education and Sport - Senior Lecturer
- Academy of Sport
- Institute for Sport, Physical Education and Health Sciences
Person: Academic: Research Active