Using Linked Longitudinal Administrative Data to Identify Social Disadvantage

Serena Pattaro, Nick Bailey, Chris Dibben

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Administrative data are widely used to construct indicators of social disadvantage, such as Free School Meals eligibility and Indices of Multiple Deprivation, for policy purposes. For research these indicators are often a compromise between accuracy and simplicity, because they rely on cross-sectional data. The growing availability of longitudinal administrative data may aid construction of more accurate indicators for research. To illustrate this potential, we use administrative data on welfare benefits from DWP’s National Benefits Database and annual earnings from employment from HMRC’s P14/P60 data to reconstruct individual labour market histories over a 5-year period. These administrative datasets were linked to survey data from the Poverty and Social Exclusion UK 2012. Results from descriptive and logistic regression analyses show that longitudinal measures correlate highly with survey responses on the same topic and are stronger predictors of poverty risks than measures based on cross-sectional data. These results suggest that longitudinal administrative measures would have potentially wide-ranging applications in policy as well as poverty research.
Original languageEnglish
JournalSocial Indicators Research
Early online date20 Sep 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 20 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Using Linked Longitudinal Administrative Data to Identify Social Disadvantage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this