Validating Retinal Fundus Image Analysis Algorithms: Issues and a Proposal

Emanuele Trucco*, Alfredo Ruggeri, Thomas Karnowski, Luca Giancardo, Edward Chaum, Jean Pierre Hubschman, Bashir al-Diri, Carol Y. Cheung, Damon Wong, Michael Abramoff, Gilbert Lim, Dinesh Kumar, Philippe Burlina, Neil M. Bressler, Herbert F. Jelinek, Fabrice Meriaudeau, Gwenole Quellec, Tom MacGillivray, Baljean Dhillon

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

This paper concerns the validation of automatic retinal image analysis (ARIA) algorithms. For reasons of space and consistency, we concentrate on the validation of algorithms processing color fundus camera images, currently the largest section of the ARIA literature. We sketch the context (imaging instruments and target tasks) of ARIA validation, summarizing the main image analysis and validation techniques. We then present a list of recommendations focusing on the creation of large repositories of test data created by international consortia, easily accessible via moderated Web sites, including multicenter annotations by multiple experts, specific to clinical tasks, and capable of running submitted software automatically on the data stored, with clear and widely agreed-on performance criteria, to provide a fair comparison.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3546-3559
Number of pages14
JournalInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (IOVS)
Volume54
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2013

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • validation
  • fundus image analysis
  • reference standards
  • TO-DISC RATIO
  • DIABETIC-RETINOPATHY
  • AUTOMATED DETECTION
  • GLAUCOMA ANALYSIS
  • MICROANEURYSM DETECTION
  • MACULAR DEGENERATION
  • VESSEL SEGMENTATION
  • COST-EFFECTIVENESS
  • SCREENING TOOL
  • CARDIAC CYCLE

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validating Retinal Fundus Image Analysis Algorithms: Issues and a Proposal'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this