Validity of an inertial measurement unit system to assess lower-limb kinematics during a maximal linear deceleration

Alistair R Jordan, Howie J Carson, Brett Wilkie, Damian J Harper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study examined the validity of an inertial measurement unit system for measuring lower-limb joint kinematics during linear decelerations. A male team athlete (age 36 years, stature 1.75 m, mass 80.0 kg) performed multiple linear decelerations, following 20 m runs at 50%, 75% and 100% self-perceived effort. Inertial measurement unit sensors were strapped to lower-limb segments and retroreflective markers were adhered to the lower-limbs for 3D optical motion analysis. Ground contact time, foot to centre of mass displacement (foot-COM), peak and minimum angle, mean angular velocity and range of motion at the ankle, knee and hip during the contact phases of each deceleration were determined. Measures were valid if a very large correlation (r ≥ 0.7) and small bias (effect size < 0.6) were evident. Following 50% effort, ground contact time, foot-COM and most hip and knee kinematics were valid. Ground contact time, foot-COM and knee flexion velocity and range of motion were valid following 75% efforts. Ground contact time and knee flexion velocity were valid following 100% effort. Therefore, the inertial measurement unit system tested can be used to assess temporal-spatial parameters during a deceleration regardless of the preceding effort, and hip and knee kinematics following low intensity running.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5–16
Number of pages12
JournalCentral European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine
Volume33
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Jun 2021

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • biomechanics
  • braking
  • IMU
  • stopping
  • Xsens

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validity of an inertial measurement unit system to assess lower-limb kinematics during a maximal linear deceleration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this