Wait, but why? Challenging the intuitive force of substance dualism

Sarah Lane Ritchie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


In responding to Joshua Farris’ The Soul of Theological Anthropology, I suggest several reasons for questioning the theological need for substance dualism in any form. Specifically, I argue that it is not at the level of analytic argumentation that the mind or soul is best understood, and that the sciences do indeed challenge substance dualism (despite philosophical arguments to the contrary). In making this argument, I examine the roles of intuition and theological pre-commitments in one’s determination of the correct understanding of the mind or soul. I suggest that dualism is not only theologically unnecessary, but also an intuition that we have reason to question.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)241-255
Number of pages15
JournalScientia et Fides
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 14 Apr 2021


  • physicalism
  • intuition
  • mind
  • soul
  • body
  • dualism


Dive into the research topics of 'Wait, but why? Challenging the intuitive force of substance dualism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this