“We can only interpret by our experiences”: Nature/culture in Forster’s ‘Cambridge’ Novels

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

This essay offers a reading of E. M. Forster’s two ‘Cambridge Novels’, The Longest Journey (1907), and Maurice (1971), that recasts Forster’s engagement with nature as one more directly interpretable through a phenomenological lens. The reception of these two novels often focuses on the redemptive quality of Cambridge as a ‘heaven for young men’, a notion based on Forster’s personal history. This underrepresents the evidence of Forster’s ethics of attending to nature. This essay, therefore, offers a fresh analysis of the fate of the main characters in the two novels. It considers the shifting values of the environment in the narratives at the beginning of the twentieth century, and their ramifications for Forster’s moral concern with lived experience and immanence connected to the natural environment. The resulting evaluation posits that entanglement with nature results in the complete subversion of human character into natureculture.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-13
Number of pages13
JournalGreen Letters: Studies in Ecocriticism
Early online date12 Oct 2018
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 12 Oct 2018

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • E. M. Forster
  • phenomenology
  • ecocriticism
  • education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '“We can only interpret by our experiences”: Nature/culture in Forster’s ‘Cambridge’ Novels'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this