What can science and technology studies learn from art and design? Reflections on ‘Synthetic Aesthetics’

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

In this paper we reflect on a project called ‘Synthetic Aesthetics’, which brought together synthetic biologists with artists and designers in paired exchanges. We – the STS researchers on the project – were quickly struck by the similarities between our objectives and those of the artists and designers. We shared interests in forging new collaborations with synthetic biologists, ‘opening up’ the science by exploring implicit assumptions, and interrogating dominant research agendas. But there were also differences between us, the most important being that the artists and designers made tangible artefacts, which had an immediacy and an ability to travel, and which seemed to allow different types of discussions from those initiated by our academic texts. The artists and designers also appeared to have the freedom to be more playful, challenging and perhaps subversive in their interactions with synthetic biology. In this paper we reflect on what we learned from working with the artists and designers on the project, and we argue that engaging more closely with art and design can enrich STS work by enabling an emergent form of critique.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)195-215
Number of pages21
JournalSocial Studies of Science
Volume47
Issue number2
Early online date27 Dec 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2017

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • art
  • design
  • collaboration
  • critical design
  • critique
  • interdisciplinarity
  • opening up
  • synthetic biology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What can science and technology studies learn from art and design? Reflections on ‘Synthetic Aesthetics’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this