What Demonstrative Induction Can Do Against the Threat of Underdetermination: Bohr, Heisenberg, and Pauli on Spectroscopic Anomalies (1921–24)

Michela Massimi

doi:10.1023/B:SYNT.0000031319.64615.49

What Demonstrative Induction Can Do Against the Threat of Underdetermination: Bohr, Heisenberg, and Pauli on Spectroscopic Anomalies (1921–24)

School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	243-277
Journal	Synthese
Volume	140
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SYNT.0000031319.64615.49
Publication status	Published - 1 Jun 2004

Access to Document

10.1023/B:SYNT.0000031319.64615.49

Cite this

@article{2f399a092ce14f67928dd3a71f9e2a49,

title = "What Demonstrative Induction Can Do Against the Threat of Underdetermination: Bohr, Heisenberg, and Pauli on Spectroscopic Anomalies (1921–24)",

author = "Michela Massimi",

year = "2004",

month = jun,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1023/B:SYNT.0000031319.64615.49",

language = "English",

volume = "140",

pages = "243--277",

journal = "Synthese",

issn = "0039-7857",

publisher = "Springer",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What Demonstrative Induction Can Do Against the Threat of Underdetermination: Bohr, Heisenberg, and Pauli on Spectroscopic Anomalies (1921–24)

AU - Massimi, Michela

PY - 2004/6/1

Y1 - 2004/6/1

U2 - 10.1023/B:SYNT.0000031319.64615.49

DO - 10.1023/B:SYNT.0000031319.64615.49

M3 - Article

SN - 0039-7857

VL - 140

SP - 243

EP - 277

JO - Synthese

JF - Synthese

IS - 3

ER -