Abstract
This article identifies and explains an important and distinctive way in which a traditional set of private law rules, doctrines, and concepts (ie those that allocate particular goods to particular individuals) relate to distributive justice. Such rules, doctrines, and concepts are instrumentally valuable vis-à-vis a just allocation of goods in two different ways. On the one hand, and less controversially, they sometimes possess the ability to cause (or contribute to causing) such states of affairs into being. The article shows that they also discharge a constitutive function in relation to distributive justice, one that is required by conceptions of distributive justice that are centred around allocation-unbound justificatory criteria (which constitute the vast majority of the available accounts of distributive justice).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 329-346 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Edinburgh Law Review |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2018 |
Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)
- distributive justice
- corrective justice
- instrumentalism
- allocation of goods
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What has Private Law ever done for Justice?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Claudio Michelon
- School of Law - Personal Chair of Philosophy of Law
- Edinburgh Centre for Legal Theory
- Edinburgh Centre for Private Law
Person: Academic: Research Active
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver