What type of controlling investors impact on which elements of corporate social responsibility?

William Rees, Tatiana Rodionova

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

Using a large sample of 3541 companies drawn from 30 countries over a period from 2002 to 2010, we analysed the impact of strategic shareholdings on different elements of corporate social responsibility (CSR). We find that total strategic or closely held equity holdings adversely affect the environmental, social and governance scores provided by ASSET4. However, this effect is largely driven by entrenched and undiversified holdings such as family and corporate cross-holdings, whereas diversified institutional investments typically have an insignificant impact. The influence of undiversified holdings includes particularly strong negative impacts on measures that include climate change, environmental management, business ethics and human rights. Thus the impact of ownership on CSR performance differs depending on both the type of owner and of CSR.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-27
Number of pages27
JournalJournal of Sustainable Finance & Investment
Early online date21 Dec 2012
Publication statusPublished - 2012
EventEuropean Business Ethics Conference - Newcastle, United Kingdom
Duration: 7 Jun 20129 Jun 2012

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • climate change
  • corporate social responsibility
  • environment
  • governance
  • human rights
  • institutional investor
  • social responsibility


Dive into the research topics of 'What type of controlling investors impact on which elements of corporate social responsibility?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this