Abstract / Description of output
This article examines the concept of ‘domination’ as it is treated in the second edition of Steven Lukes’ (2005) Power: A radical view. It argues that Lukes’ conception of domination is preoccupied with the condition of being dominated, neglecting to adequately define dominance and the relationship of domination. This conceptual imbalance is closely related to intrinsic problems of distinguishing between domination and ‘social control’ more generally. The conclusion offers a provisional, disaggregated ‘ensemble’ of concepts for talking about different modes of domination with different attendant moral implications, suggesting a need for a less monolithic conception of domination.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 37-49 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Journal of Power |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 26 Mar 2008 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2008 |
Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)
- power
- domination
- social control
- social critique
- Steven Lukes