TY - JOUR
T1 - Why nature matters: A systematic review of intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values.
AU - Himes, Austin
AU - Muraca, Barbara
AU - Anderson, Christopher B
AU - Athayde, Simone
AU - Beery, Thomas
AU - Cantú-Fernández, Marianna
AU - González-Jiménez, David
AU - Gould, Rachelle K
AU - Hejnowicz, Adam
AU - Kenter, Jasper
AU - Lenzi, Dominic
AU - Murali, Ranjini
AU - Pascual, Unai
AU - Raymond, Christopher M
AU - Ring, Annalie
AU - Russo, Kurt
AU - Samakov, Aibek
AU - Stålhammar, Sanna
AU - Thorén, Henrick
AU - Zent, Egleé
PY - 2023/12/26
Y1 - 2023/12/26
N2 - In this article, we present results from a literature review of intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values of nature conducted for the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, as part of the Methodological Assessment of the Diverse Values and Valuations of Nature. We identify the most frequently recurring meanings in the heterogeneous use of different value types and their association with worldviews and other key concepts. From frequent uses, we determine a core meaning for each value type, which is sufficiently inclusive to serve as an umbrella over different understandings in the literature and specific enough to help highlight its difference from the other types of values. Finally, we discuss convergences, overlapping areas, and fuzzy boundaries between different value types to facilitate dialogue, reduce misunderstandings, and improve the methods for valuation of nature's contributions to people, including ecosystem services, to inform policy and direct future research.
AB - In this article, we present results from a literature review of intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values of nature conducted for the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, as part of the Methodological Assessment of the Diverse Values and Valuations of Nature. We identify the most frequently recurring meanings in the heterogeneous use of different value types and their association with worldviews and other key concepts. From frequent uses, we determine a core meaning for each value type, which is sufficiently inclusive to serve as an umbrella over different understandings in the literature and specific enough to help highlight its difference from the other types of values. Finally, we discuss convergences, overlapping areas, and fuzzy boundaries between different value types to facilitate dialogue, reduce misunderstandings, and improve the methods for valuation of nature's contributions to people, including ecosystem services, to inform policy and direct future research.
U2 - 10.1093/biosci/biad109
DO - 10.1093/biosci/biad109
M3 - Review article
SN - 0006-3568
VL - 74
SP - 25
EP - 43
JO - BioScience
JF - BioScience
IS - 1
ER -