TY - JOUR
T1 - Why San Franciscans used to sound like New Yorkers
AU - Hall-Lew, Lauren
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - San Francisco English has been described as dialectologically distinct from the rest of California, as indicated in the earliest studies (DeCamp 1953) up through The Atlas of North American English (Labov, Ash, and Boberg 2006). Just as Carmichael (2024 [this volume]) describes for New Orleans, the evidence suggests that vowel changes in San Francisco English “defied straightforward classification into neighboring dialect areas.” However, the distinction seems to have faded among those speakers born after the 1970s (Hall-Lew 2013; HallLew, Cardoso, and Davies 2021). We can therefore ask: What was the nature of this distinction? What did the dialect sound like? Where did it come from? Who spoke it? And why did it change?
AB - San Francisco English has been described as dialectologically distinct from the rest of California, as indicated in the earliest studies (DeCamp 1953) up through The Atlas of North American English (Labov, Ash, and Boberg 2006). Just as Carmichael (2024 [this volume]) describes for New Orleans, the evidence suggests that vowel changes in San Francisco English “defied straightforward classification into neighboring dialect areas.” However, the distinction seems to have faded among those speakers born after the 1970s (Hall-Lew 2013; HallLew, Cardoso, and Davies 2021). We can therefore ask: What was the nature of this distinction? What did the dialect sound like? Where did it come from? Who spoke it? And why did it change?
U2 - 10.1215/00031283-11587979
DO - 10.1215/00031283-11587979
M3 - Article
SN - 2157-6114
VL - 109
SP - 167
EP - 193
JO - Publication of the American Dialect Society
JF - Publication of the American Dialect Society
IS - 1
ER -