Why the A/AN prediction effect may be hard to replicate: A rebuttal to Delong, Urbach, and Kutas

Aine Ito, Andrea E. Martin, Mante S. Nieuwland

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1-10
Number of pages	10
Journal	Language, Cognition and Neuroscience
Early online date	9 May 2017
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2017.1323112
Publication status	E-pub ahead of print - 9 May 2017

Access to Document

ItoEtalLCN2017WhyTheA/ANPredictionEffect
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Language, Cognition and Neuroscience on 09 May 2017, available online: http://wwww.tandfonline.com/10.1080/23273798.2017.1323112
Accepted author manuscript, 531 KB

@article{9051cdee7e024f93965163bf7f9cbfb1,

title = "Why the A/AN prediction effect may be hard to replicate: A rebuttal to Delong, Urbach, and Kutas",

author = "Aine Ito and Martin, {Andrea E.} and Nieuwland, {Mante S.}",

year = "2017",

month = may,

day = "9",

doi = "10.1080/23273798.2017.1323112",

language = "English",

pages = "1--10",

journal = "Language, Cognition and Neuroscience",

issn = "2327-3798",

publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why the A/AN prediction effect may be hard to replicate

T2 - A rebuttal to Delong, Urbach, and Kutas

AU - Ito, Aine

AU - Martin, Andrea E.

AU - Nieuwland, Mante S.

PY - 2017/5/9

Y1 - 2017/5/9

U2 - 10.1080/23273798.2017.1323112

DO - 10.1080/23273798.2017.1323112

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience

JF - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience

SN - 2327-3798

ER -