Your Proposal Doesn’t Fit in Our Editorial Line: Constructing a Dissident Researcher

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

Abstract

In this article I discuss the possibility of and the necessity for dissident researchers in academia. I investigate the strategies of interruption as methods of engaging with the institution through artistic research and approaches. Art as a dissensual activity turns artistic research into a dissident research that can serve to question academic consensus rather than conforming to its established structure.

In order to construct a dissident researcher, I go through three short architectural narrations of three places: a prison (as discipline), a school of architecture (as artistic research) and a library (as dominant discourse). These three narrations are combined with three formulae: amateur, fiction, misperformance or disloyalty; each acts as certain characteristics of dissidence that are pertinent to an ongoing micro-project explained here. Together, these aim to raise the question: How does perceiving artistic research as dissident research modify conventional evaluation systems and set up new evaluating strategies based on politics of dissidence?
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusUnpublished - 2015
EventInternational Symposium Transvaluation: Making the World Matter. - Chalmers University, Gothenburg, Sweden
Duration: 21 May 201522 May 2015
https://www.chalmers.se/en/departments/ace/news/Pages/Transvaluation-Making-the-world-matter-2015.aspx

Conference

ConferenceInternational Symposium Transvaluation: Making the World Matter.
CountrySweden
CityGothenburg
Period21/05/1522/05/15
Internet address

Keywords

  • dissident, amateur, misperformance, interrupting architecture, artistic research, fiction

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Your Proposal Doesn’t Fit in Our Editorial Line: Constructing a Dissident Researcher'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this