Edinburgh Research Explorer

Analysis of host response to bacterial infection using error model based gene expression microarray experiments

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  • D J Stekel
  • D Sarti
  • V Trevino
  • L Zhang
  • M Salmon
  • C D Buckley
  • M Stevens
  • M J Pallen
  • C Penn
  • F Falciani

Related Edinburgh Organisations

Open Access permissions



  • Download as Adobe PDF

    Rights statement: This an Open Access article.

    Final published version, 501 KB, PDF document

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere53
Pages (from-to)-
Number of pages13
JournalNucleic Acids Research
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 2005


A key step in the analysis of microarray data is the selection of genes that are differentially expressed. Ideally, such experiments should be properly replicated in order to infer both technical and biological variability, and the data should be subjected to rigorous hypothesis tests to identify the differentially expressed genes. However, in microarray experiments involving the analysis of very large numbers of biological samples, replication is not always practical. Therefore, there is a need for a method to select differentially expressed genes in a rational way from insufficiently replicated data. In this paper, we describe a simple method that uses bootstrapping to generate an error model from a replicated pilot study that can be used to identify differentially expressed genes in subsequent large-scale studies on the same platform, but in which there may be no replicated arrays. The method builds a stratified error model that includes array-to-array variability, feature-to-feature variability and the dependence of error on signal intensity. We apply this model to the characterization of the host response in a model of bacterial infection of human intestinal epithelial cells. We demonstrate the effectiveness of error model based microarray experiments and propose this as a general strategy for a microarray-based screening of large collections of biological samples.

Download statistics

No data available

ID: 4079169