Edinburgh Research Explorer

Anaphoric biases of null and overt subjects in Italian and Spanish: a cross-linguistic comparison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related Edinburgh Organisations

Open Access permissions

Open

Documents

  • Download as Adobe PDF

    Rights statement: © This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Language and Cognitive Processes on 9/8/2014, available online: http://wwww.tandfonline.com/10.1080/01690965.2013.801502.

    Accepted author manuscript, 845 KB, PDF document

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)825-843
JournalLanguage and Cognitive Processes
Volume29
Issue number7
Early online date12 Jun 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Aug 2014

Abstract

The present study explores the cross-linguistic differences between Spanish and Italian in the anaphoric interpretation of null subjects and overt pronominal subjects. The availability of null subjects in a language is determined by the parametric settings of its syntax, but their felicitous use as an alternative to overt pronouns depends on contextual conditions affecting how different expressions retrieve their antecedents in the discourse. According to Accessibility Theory, at least some of these principles must have universal validity; however, up to now no experimental research has been carried out with the aim of comparing directly the interpretation of anaphoric dependencies in two typologically similar null subject languages. In this paper, we report the results of two pairs of self-paced reading experiments carried out in Spanish and in Italian. The results show a similar pattern for the resolution of null subjects, as predicted by Accessibility Theory, whereas the resolution of overt pronouns seems to diverge. This suggests that subtle differences restricted to the scope of the overt pronoun yield systematic variation between the two languages.

Download statistics

No data available

ID: 7895372