Edinburgh Research Explorer

Assessing innovation: A 360-degree appraisal study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related Edinburgh Organisations

Open Access permissions

Open

Documents

  • Download as Adobe PDF

    Rights statement: This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedited version of an article published in International Journal of Selection and Assessment. The definitive publisher-authenticated version is available online at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijsa.12012/abstract © Potocnik, K., & Anderson, N. (2012). Assessing innovation: A 360-degree appraisal study. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 20(4), 497-509. 10.1111/ijsa.12012

    Accepted author manuscript, 726 KB, PDF document

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijsa.12012/abstract
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)497-509
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Nov 2012

Abstract

This study examines the evaluation of innovation in a wider competency framework and within a 360‐degree rating procedure among managerial‐level job holders. The total sample of 2,979 individuals consisted of 296 target employees and their 318 bosses, 1208 peers, 828 direct reports, and 329 others who provided ratings on a competency framework. The results showed significant differences in innovation‐related competence ratings between different raters. Self-ratings were significantly lower compared to the overall observer ratings and were correlated only with peer ratings. Different patterns of results were found for the lower and upper quartiles based on self-ratings. For instance, no correlations were observed between self-ratings and the ratings of any observers in the group of best self-rated individuals. Implications for practice and future research in assessment and evaluation of innovation are discussed in conclusion.

Download statistics

No data available

ID: 3536652