Edinburgh Research Explorer

Clinical utility and diagnostic accuracy of faecal calprotectin for IBD at first presentation to gastroenterology services in adults aged 16–50 years

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related Edinburgh Organisations

Open Access permissions

Open

Documents

http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1873994614002189
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)41-9
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Crohn's and Colitis
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2014

Abstract

Background
Distinguishing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) from functional gastrointestinal (GI) disease remains an important issue for gastroenterologists and primary care physicians, and may be difficult on the basis of symptoms alone. Faecal calprotectin (FC) is a surrogate marker for intestinal inflammation but not cancer.

Aim
This large retrospective study aimed to determine the most effective use of FC in patients aged 16–50 presenting with GI symptoms.

Methods
FC results were obtained for patients presenting to the GI clinics in Edinburgh between 2005 and 2009 from the Edinburgh Faecal Calprotectin Registry containing FCs from >16,000 patients. Case notes were interrogated to identify demographics, subsequent investigations and diagnoses.

Results
895 patients were included in the main analysis, 65% female and with a median age of 33 years. 10.2% were diagnosed with IBD, 7.3% with another GI condition associated with an abnormal GI tract and 63.2% had functional GI disease. Median FC in these three groups were 1251, 50 and 20 μg/g (p < 0.0001). On ROC analysis, the AUC for FC as a predictor of IBD vs. functional disease was 0.97. Using a threshold of ≥ 50 μg/g for IBD vs. functional disease yielded a sensitivity of 0.97, specificity of 0.74, positive predictive value of 0.37 and negative predictive value of 0.99. Combined with alarm symptoms, the sensitivity was 1.00.

Conclusions
Implementation of FC in the initial diagnostic workup of young patients with GI symptoms, particularly those without alarm symptoms, is highly accurate in the exclusion of IBD, and can provide reassurance to patients and physicians.

Download statistics

No data available

ID: 16975792