Edinburgh Research Explorer

Dealing with reviewers’ comments in the publication process

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Related Edinburgh Organisations

Open Access permissions



  • Download as Adobe PDF

    Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice on 15/06/2015, available online: http://wwww.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17521882.2015.1047463.

    Accepted author manuscript, 710 KB, PDF document

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)169-180
JournalCoaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice
Issue number2
Early online date15 Jun 2015
Publication statusPublished - 2015


This article focuses on the challenges for authors of dealing with an editor’s and reviewers’ comments within the manuscript publication process. The paper commences with an overview of the peer review process. The nature and style of comments from editors and reviewers is outlined and the inherent meaning demystified. Using a wide range of anonymised examples, sample comments are categorised according to their ease of being addressed and whether or not the author agrees with them and the need to respond highlighted. Advice is offered regarding the construction of a response document, outlining how editor and reviewer comments have been addressed in the revised manuscript and an example comprising both editor and reviewer comments and author responses provided. The importance of this document in providing a clear audit trail of associated amendments to the manuscript and their justifications in response to the editor’s and reviewers’ comments is emphasised.

Download statistics

No data available

ID: 19522557