Edinburgh Research Explorer

Differential case-marking: Syntactic descriptions and pragmatic explanations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related Edinburgh Organisations

Open Access permissions

Open

Documents

  • Download as Adobe PDF

    Rights statement: © Cann, R., & Miljan, M. (2012). Differential case-marking: Syntactic descriptions and pragmatic explanations. The Linguistic Review, 29(4), 585-605doi: 10.1515/tlr-2012-0021 The final publication is available at www.degruyter.com

    Final published version, 168 KB, PDF-document

http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/tlr.2012.29.issue-4/tlr-2012-0021/tlr-2012-0021.xml
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)585-605
Number of pages20
JournalThe Linguistic Review
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Jan 2012

Abstract

In this paper, we argue for an approach to grammatical case that treats case-marking not as the passive realisation of other morpho-syntactic properties of a construction, but as bringing its own independent contribution to the construal of a clause, through inference over possibly underspecified semantic content of a case-marker in context. We take as case studies two instances of Differential Case-Marking: the partitive alternation in Estonian and differential uses of the marker ko in Hindi/Urdu. For Estonian, it is argued that the partitive case is semantically partitive even in alternation in grammatical contexts with nominative and genitive. From this assumption, we derive the various construals of the partitive as indicating indefinite quantity or imperfective aspect and show how other uses of the case, including after negation, may be traced to the basic partitive interpretation. We also argue that the completive interpretations of nominative and genitive derive from contrast with the partitive reading, rather than as being encoded in the case marking itself. With Hindi/Urdu ‘dative’ maker ko, we argue how pragmatic inference can operate also over grammatical levels to explain the uses of the marker with human direct objects, to specify definiteness of inanimate direct objects and, in alternation with ergative ne, deontic modality.

Download statistics

No data available

ID: 4969570