Edinburgh Research Explorer

ECAS A-B-C: Alternate forms of the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • Christopher Crockford
  • Michaela Kleynhans
  • Evelyn Wilton
  • Ratko Radakovic
  • Judith Newton
  • Elaine Niven
  • Ammar Al Chalabi
  • Orla Hardiman
  • Thomas Bak
  • Sharon Abrahams

Related Edinburgh Organisations

Access status



  • Download as Adobe PDF

    Final published version, 712 KB, PDF-document

    License: Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-8
JournalAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration
Early online date5 Dec 2017
StateE-pub ahead of print - 5 Dec 2017


Background: The Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen (ECAS) is a short assessment by which neuropsychological symptoms can be detected and quantified in people with ALS. To avoid potential practice effects with repeated administration, here we present alternative versions of the ECAS suitable to measure change over timeObjective: To develop two alternate versions of the ECAS: ECAS-B and ECAS-CMethod: 149 healthy adult participants were recruited. 30 participants completed a pilot study in developing the alternate versions. Two groups of 40 participants were administered the ECAS-B or ECAS-C and compared to published data of the original ECAS (ECAS-A) to determine equivalence. An additional 39 participants were administered the ECAS consecutively, either repeating the original version (ECAS-A-A-A) serially or the different versions (ECAS-A-B-C) to determine potential practice effects. Recordings of assessments were scored by a second researcher to determine inter-rater reliability. Results: No significant differences were found between versions (A, B, C) of the composite performance measures of ALS Specific, ALS Non-Specific, and ECAS Total scores. Repeated serial administration of ECAS-A (A-A-A) produced some practice effects for composite scores, whereas no such effects were found when alternate versions were administered serially (A-B-C). Exceptionally high intra-class correlations were found for all three versions of the ECAS suggesting a high degree of rater agreement.  Conclusion: The newly developed alternate forms of the ECAS are both highly equitable to the original ECAS-A and enable avoidance of practice effects, thus supporting their use in measuring cognition and behaviour over time.  

    Research areas

  • cognition, ECAS, alternate forms, behaviour, reliability, screen

Download statistics

No data available

ID: 47049035