Edinburgh Research Explorer

Economic and psychological perspectives on CEO compensation: a review and synthesis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related Edinburgh Organisations

Open Access permissions

Open

Documents

  • Download as Adobe PDF

    Rights statement: This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Industrial and Corporate Change following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version, Main, B. & O'Reilly, I. I. I. C. A. (2010), "Economic and Psychological Perspectives on CEO Pay: A Review and Synthesis", in Industrial and Corporate Change. 19, p. 675-712, is available online at: http://icc.oxfordjournals.org/content/19/3/675.abstract

    Accepted author manuscript, 218 KB, PDF document

http://icc.oxfordjournals.org/content/19/3/675
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)675-712
Number of pages38
JournalIndustrial and Corporate Change
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2010

Abstract

To many, the principal–agent model is the obvious lens through which executive pay should be viewed. Such a sentiment sits uncomfortably with a large number of empirical studies suggesting that the process of determining executive pay seems to be more readily explained by recourse to arguments of managerial power and influence. This article investigates the micro-underpinnings of boardroom behavior in order to explain this departure from principal–agency theory’s argument that executive compensation serves to align interests between the owners of the company and its senior managers. We find that there are strong interaction effects among social influence variables and the social setting of boardroom activity. Generous pay awards, bearing only a weak connection to corporate performance, are explained in the context of the social psychology of the boardroom. These results and a review of the empirical research, suggest the need for a more comprehensive model of executive compensation that incorporates both economic and psychological determinants.

Download statistics

No data available

ID: 278470