Edinburgh Research Explorer

European green mutual fund performance: A comparative analysis with their conventional and black peers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related Edinburgh Organisations

Open Access permissions

Open

Documents

  • Download as Adobe PDF

    Rights statement: The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2850-7

    Accepted author manuscript, 980 KB, PDF document

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)337-355
JournalJournal of Business Ethics
Volume145
Issue number2
Early online date7 Sep 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Oct 2017

Abstract

We conduct the first comparative analysis of the financial performance of European green, black (fossil energy and natural resource) and conventional mutual funds. Based on a unique dataset of 175 green, 259 black and 976 conventional mutual funds, the investigation contrasts the financial performance of the three dissimilar investment orientations over the 1991–2014 period. Over the full sample period, green mutual funds significantly underperform relative to conventional funds, while no significant risk-adjusted performance differences between green and black mutual funds could be established during the same period. Environmentally friendly investment vehicles display a significant exposure to small cap and growth stocks, while black funds are more exposed to value stocks. Remarkably, the green funds’ risk-adjusted return profile progressively improves over time until no difference in the performance of the green and the conventional classes could be discerned. Further evidence suggests that the green funds are beginning to significantly outperform their black peers, especially over the 2012–2014 investment window.

    Research areas

  • green mutual funds, black mutual funds , conventional mutual funds , socially responsible investments, risk-adjusted returns

Download statistics

No data available

ID: 21536913