Edinburgh Research Explorer

Japanese alternative questions are disjunctions of polar questions

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Related Edinburgh Organisations

Open Access permissions

Open

Documents

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 24
EditorsTodd Snider, Sarah D'Antonio, Mia Weigand
Place of PublicationIthaca, NY
PublisherLinguistic Society of America
Chapter3
Pages23-41
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2014

Abstract

We discuss the syntax and semantics of Japanese alternative questions (AltQs), and argue that they are underlyingly disjoined polar questions (PolQs). The argument is based on the following three observations: (i) the minimum syntactic size of a disjunct in a Japanese AltQ is VP or clausal, (ii) sentential operators above the disjunction in an AltQ are never interpreted in both disjuncts, and (iii) the clause-final particle in an AltQ has to be matched with the particle at the end of the first disjunct. It will be shown that these facts receive straightforward explanations under the analysis that treats Japanese AltQs as disjoined PolQs while they are problematic in a scoping analysis. We also propose a compositional semantics associated with the analysis, and address a potential problem regarding the intervention effect.

    Research areas

  • questions, alternative questions, polar questions, disjunction, Japanese

Download statistics

No data available

ID: 106804882