Edinburgh Research Explorer

Knowledge sharing, problem solving and professional development in a Scottish Ecosystem Services Community of Practice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • Marc Metzger
  • Jan Dick
  • Abi Gardner
  • Chloe Bellamy
  • Kirsty Blackstock
  • Calum Brown
  • Rachel Chisholm
  • Phobe Cochrane
  • Joanna Drewitt
  • Alessandro Gimona
  • Alison Hester
  • Scot Mathieson
  • Maria Nijnik
  • Alistair McVittie
  • Michal Petr
  • Ron Smith
  • Mike Smith

Related Edinburgh Organisations

Open Access permissions

Open

Documents

  • Download as Adobe PDF

    Rights statement: © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

    Final published version, 476 KB, PDF document

    Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY)

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10113-019-01537-0
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-12
JournalRegional Environmental Change
Early online date21 Jul 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 21 Jul 2019

Abstract

The ecosystem services framework has now been embodied in policy and practice, creating the need for governance structures that allow science, policy and practice to come together and facilitate shared learning. We describe five years of progress in developing an Ecosystem Services Community of Practice in Scotland, which brings together over 600 individuals from diverse constituencies to share experiences and learn from each other. We consider the ‘community’ and ‘practice’ aspects to demonstrate the benefits of establishing an Ecosystem Services Community (ESCom). We also demonstrate how the journey involved in the creation and continuing evolution of ESCom has proved valuable to researchers, policy-makers, practitioners and students and as such has contributed to social learning. We reflect on challenges, given the voluntary nature, absence of formal institutional support and emergence of initiatives focusing on overlapping topics. Based on our experience, we provide ten recommendations to help future ecosystem services communities of practice.

Download statistics

No data available

ID: 96510369