Edinburgh Research Explorer

Modelling carbonaceous aerosol from residential solid fuel burning with different assumptions for emissions

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • Riinu Ots
  • Mathew Heal
  • Dominique Young
  • Leah Williams
  • James Allan
  • Eiko Nemitz
  • Chiara Di Marco
  • Anais Detournay
  • Lu Xu
  • Nga. L. Ng
  • Hugh Coe
  • Scott C. Herndon
  • Ian Mackenzie
  • David Green
  • Jeroen J.P. Kuenen
  • Stefan Reis
  • Massimo Vieno

Related Edinburgh Organisations

Open Access permissions

Open

Documents

  • Download as Adobe PDF

    Final published version, 7 MB, PDF document

    Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY)

https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/18/4497/2018/
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4497-4518
Number of pages22
JournalAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Volume18
Early online date4 Apr 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Apr 2018

Abstract

Evidence is accumulating that emissions of primary particulate matter (PM) from residential wood and coal combustion in the UK may be underestimated and/or spatially misclassified. In this study, different assumptions for the spatial distribution and total emission of PM from solid fuel (wood and coal) burning in the UK were tested using an atmospheric chemical transport model. Modelled concentrations of the PM components were compared with measurements from aerosol mass spectrometers at four sites in central and Greater London (ClearfLo campaign, 2012), as well as with measurements from the UK black carbon network.

The two main alternative emission scenarios modelled were Base4x and combRedist. For Base4x, officially reported PM2.5 from the residential and other non-industrial combustion source sector were increased by a factor of four. For the combRedist experiment, half of the baseline emissions from this same source were redistributed by residential population density to simulate the effect of allocating some emissions to the smoke control areas (that are assumed in the national inventory to have no emissions from this source). The Base4x scenario yielded better daily and hourly correlations with measurements than the combRedist scenario for year-long comparisons of the solid fuel organic aerosol (SFOA) component at the two London sites. However, the latter scenario better captured mean measured concentrations across all four sites. A third experiment, Redist – all emissions redistributed linearly to population density, is also presented as an indicator of the maximum concentrations an assumption like this could yield.

The modelled elemental carbon (EC) concentrations derived from the combRedist experiments also compared well with seasonal average concentrations of black carbon observed across the network of UK sites. Together, the two model scenario simulations of SFOA and EC suggest both that residential solid fuel emissions may be higher than inventory estimates and that the spatial distribution of residential solid fuel burning emissions, particularly in smoke control areas, needs re-evaluation. The model results also suggest the assumed temporal profiles for residential emissions may require review to place greater emphasis on evening (including “discretionary”) solid fuel burning.

    Research areas

  • PM source apportionment, organic aerosol, solid fuel OA, Air Pollution, atmospheric modelling, aerosol mass spectrometry, Elemental Carbon, Black carbon

Download statistics

No data available

ID: 57635546