Edinburgh Research Explorer

New materialism and social justice: New materialism and social justice a space for productive entanglement, or a political cul-de-sac?

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstract

Related Edinburgh Organisations

Open Access permissions

Open

Documents

Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 22 Sep 2016
EventNew Materialism Conference 2016 - Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
Duration: 21 Sep 201623 Sep 2016

Conference

ConferenceNew Materialism Conference 2016
CountryPoland
CityWarsaw
Period21/09/1623/09/16

Abstract

Recent developments in new materialist (NM) politics have surfaced the problem of what social justice might look like in the wake of the post-human. NM has produced its own situated knowledges, which have re-theorised the ‘social’. To an extent, these situated spaces have developed in isolation from established spaces of social justice scholarship. In NM, the ‘social’ is recuperated in a flat ontology, as a mere synonym for the ‘ecological’ (Bryant 2014, p. 192). In this context, one might be tempted to simply conclude that social justice be jettisoned as a normative concept in NM politics altogether. However, NM’s political roots in feminist praxis suggest otherwise. Therefore, this re-theorisation of the ‘social’ requires a re-theorisation of ‘social justice’ and its various dimensions – distributive, recognitive and participatory (Fraser 2005). NM claims that a ‘quasi-vitalist’ (e.g. Bennett 2010), ‘post-humanist’ (e.g. Braidotti 2013, Bryant 2014) or ‘alien phenomenological’ (Bogost 2012) sensibility provides a more productive intellectual framework for thinking through the seemingly intractable problems of our times, from climate change to techno-capitalism. This sensibility prompts reconsideration of who and what can be considered legitimate subjects, and indeed agents, of social (in)justice (Haraway 1988). With this in mind, we re-consider Fraser’s conceptualisation of social justice in the wake of NM. Specifically, a theory of distributed agency aims to call our attention to complex material entanglements of flesh, machine, culture and nature in order that we have better roadmaps for political intervention. But intervention to what end? NM scholarship has been critiqued as a process of ‘bolting on’ complexity theory to a tacit humanist politics (Cudworth and Hobdin 2014). This paper will clarify and critically interrogate the relationship between the analytical utility and normative commitments of NM in the context of social justice and show it to be largely under-theorised. Keywords: social justice; normativity; distributive justice, recognition, agency, politics References Bennett, J. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press Bogost, I. 2012. Alien Phenomenology, or What it’s Like to be a Thing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press Braidotti, R. 2013. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press. Bryant, L. 2015. Onto-Cartography: An Ontology of Machines and Media. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press Cudworth, E. & Hobden, S., 2014. Liberation for Straw Dogs? Old Materialism, New Materialism, and the Challenge of an Emancipatory Posthumanism. Globalizations, 12(1), pp.134-148. Fraser, N. 2005. Reframing Justice in a Globalizing World. New Left Review, 36, pp. 69-88. Haraway, D., 1988. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), pp.575–599.

    Research areas

  • social justice, new materialism, normativity, politics, agency

Event

New Materialism Conference 2016

21/09/1623/09/16

Warsaw, Poland

Event: Conference

Download statistics

No data available

ID: 48417149