Edinburgh Research Explorer

On gradience and optionality in non-native grammars

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)741-742
JournalBehavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1996

Abstract

Epstein et al.'s ''full access to Universal Grammar'' position is conceptually and empirically problematic. Its shortcomings are illustrated through a brief discussion of the following issues: (1) initial versus final states of grammatical knowledge in a second language, (2) knowledge of gradience of grammaticality, (3) optionality and retention in non-native grammars, and (4) the empirical measurement of syntactic knowledge.

ID: 21858047