Edinburgh Research Explorer

Optimized fragmentation regime for diazirine photo-cross-linked peptides

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related Edinburgh Organisations

Open Access permissions

Open

Documents

  • Download as Adobe PDF

    Rights statement: This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the author and source are cited.

    Final published version, 1 MB, PDF-document

    Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)8239–8247
JournalAnalytical Chemistry
Volume88
Issue number16
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Jul 2016

Abstract

Cross-linking/mass spectrometry has evolved into a robust technology that reveals structural insights into proteins and protein complexes. We leverage a new tribrid instrument with improved fragmentation capacities in a systematic comparison to identify which fragmentation method would be best for the identification of cross-linked peptides. Specifically, we explored three fragmentation methods and two combinations: collision-induced dissociation (CID), beamtype CID (HCD), electron-transfer dissociation (ETD), ETciD and EThcD. Trypsin-digested, SDA-cross-linked human serum albumin (HSA) served as test sample, yielding over all methods and in triplicate analysis in total 2,602 matched PSMs and 1,390 linked residue pairs at 5% false discovery rate, as confirmed by the crystal structure. HCD wins in number of matched peptidespectrum-matches (958 PSMs) and identified links (446). CID is most complementary, increasing the number of identified links by 13% (58 links). HCD wins together with EThcD in cross-link site calling precision, with approximately 62% of sites having adjacent back-bone cleavages that unambiguously locate the link in both peptides, without assuming any crosslinker preference for amino acids. Overall quality of spectra as judged by sequence coverage of both peptides is best for EThcD for the majority of peptides. Sequence coverage might be of particular importance for complex samples, for which we propose a data dependant decision tree, else HCD is the method of choice. The mass spectrometric raw data has been deposited in PRIDE (PXD003737).

Download statistics

No data available

ID: 26890702