Edinburgh Research Explorer

Sport-for-development and the struggle for subaltern voices to be recognised: A response to Manley, Morgan and Atkinson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related Edinburgh Organisations

Open Access permissions

Open

Documents

  • Download as Adobe PDF

    Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics on 6th September 2017, available online: http://wwww.tandfonline.com/10.1080/19406940.2017.1372794           

    Accepted author manuscript, 677 KB, PDF document

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)723-738
JournalInternational Journal of Sport Policy and Politics
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Sep 2017

Abstract

In their article entitled, ‘Mzungu!’: implications of identity, role formation and programme delivery in the sport for development movement, published in volume 8(3) of this journal, Manley, Morgan and Atkinson focus on constructions of volunteer identities using Goffman’s dramaturgical analysis of social interactions. Their empirical work is based on an international volunteering placement within the sport-for-development (SfD) sector in Zambia. The authors highlight social interactions between UK student volunteers and host country social actors as encounters that influence volunteer identity, role formation or identity disruption. We offer a response to their article with particular attention to critiquing the knowledge production and programme development approaches employed to undertake research among economically marginalised communities. We draw on postcolonial theory and Long’s actor-oriented approach to capture alternative narratives in SfD research. To support our critical response to the limited application of the dramaturgical perspective by Manley et al., we further apply four of Goffman’s perspectives to analyse social establishments. By so doing, we bring to the fore social processes within which the agency of local social actors is neglected by Manley et al. Instead, the authors state their sampling limitations. We argue that it is the responsibility of privileged intellectuals in global North institutions to reach out to subaltern voices rather than resorting to stating limitations of sampling techniques. Such limitations simply extend the marginalisation of global South voices and exacerbate asymmetrical powers which enable those with resources to undertake SfD research to define the ‘other’.

    Research areas

  • sport-for-development, identity, social interaction, dramaturgical perspective, subaltern voice, student volunteer, hegemony

Download statistics

No data available

ID: 42858797