Edinburgh Research Explorer

The existential/uniqueness presupposition of wh-complements projects from the answers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related Edinburgh Organisations

Open Access permissions

Open

Documents

  • Download as Adobe PDF

    Final published version, 626 KB, PDF document

    Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY)

Original languageEnglish
JournalLinguistics and Philosophy
Early online date9 Sep 2020
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 9 Sep 2020

Abstract

he projection pattern of the existential/uniqueness presupposition of a wh-complement varies depending on the predicate that embeds it. This variation poses problems for existing accounts that treat the presupposition as a seman-tic contribution of an operator merging with the wh-complement (Dayal, 1996) or of the embedding predicate (Uegaki, 2015). I propose that the problems can be solved if the existential/uniqueness presupposition is contributed by the propositions corresponding to the answers of the embedded question, under the Hamblin/Karttunen semantics for questions.

    Research areas

  • questions, embedded questions, wh-complements, presupposition of questions, uniqueness presupposition

ID: 164147555