Edinburgh Research Explorer

The MOSDEF Survey: Optical AGN Diagnostics at z~2.3

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • Alison L. Coil
  • James Aird
  • Naveen Reddy
  • Alice E. Shapley
  • Mariska Kriek
  • Brian Siana
  • Bahram Mobasher
  • William R. Freeman
  • Sedona H. Price
  • Irene Shivaei

Related Edinburgh Organisations

Open Access permissions



Original languageEnglish
JournalAstrophysical Journal
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 7 Feb 2015


We present results from the MOSFIRE Deep Evolution Field (MOSDEF) survey on rest-frame optical AGN identification and completeness at z~2.3. With our sample of 50 galaxies and 10 X-ray and IR-selected AGN with measured H-beta, [OIII], H-alpha, and [NII] emission lines, we investigate the location of AGN in the BPT, MEx (mass-excitation), and CEx (color-excitation) diagrams. We find that the BPT diagram works well to identify AGN at z~2.3 and that the z~0 AGN/star-forming galaxy classifications do not need to shift substantially at z~2.3 to robustly separate these populations. However, the MEx diagram fails to identify all of the AGN identified in the BPT diagram, and the CEx diagram is substantially contaminated at high redshift. We further show that AGN samples selected using the BPT diagram have selection biases in terms of both host stellar mass and stellar population, in that AGN in low mass and/or high specific star formation rate galaxies are difficult to identify using the BPT diagram. These selection biases become increasingly severe at high redshift, such that optically-selected AGN samples at high redshift will necessarily be incomplete. We also find that the gas in the narrow-line region appears to be more enriched than gas in the host galaxy for at least some MOSDEF AGN. However, AGN at z~2 are generally less enriched than local AGN with the same host stellar mass.

    Research areas

  • astro-ph.GA

Download statistics

No data available

ID: 173098562