Edinburgh Research Explorer

UK trainee sport psychologists’ perspectives on developing professional judgement and decision-making expertise during training

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related Edinburgh Organisations

Open Access permissions



  • Download as Adobe PDF

    Rights statement: Manuscript has been published online as Ahead of Print: Accepted author manuscript version reprinted, by permission, from The Sport Psychologist, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.2018-0112. © Human Kinetics, Inc.

    Accepted author manuscript, 628 KB, PDF document

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)334-343
Number of pages34
JournalThe Sport Psychologist
Issue number4
Early online date1 Apr 2019
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2019


The research team explored UK trainee sport psychologists’ perspectives on developing professional judgment and decision-making (PJDM) expertise during their British Psychological Society (BPS) Qualification in Sport and Exercise Psychology (QSEP; Stage 2). An assorted analysis approach was adopted to combine an existing longitudinal qualitative data set with the collection and analysis of a new qualitative data set. Participants (female, n = 1; and male, n = 6) were interviewed 4 times over a 3-year training period, at minimum yearly intervals. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and reflexive thematic analysis applied to transcripts using the theoretical concepts of PJDM. Experience, analytical reasoning, and observation of other practitioners’ practice was useful for developing PJDM expertise. PJDM expertise might be optimised through the use of knowledge elicitation principles. For example, supervisors could embed critical cues within the anecdotes they share to expand the experience base that trainees can draw from when making decisions.

    Research areas

  • professional training, cognition, judgement, decision-making

Download statistics

No data available

ID: 80756505