Edinburgh Research Explorer

Word learning under infinite uncertainty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Related Edinburgh Organisations

Documents

  • Download as Adobe PDF

    Rights statement: @ 2016. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

    Submitted manuscript, 737 KB, PDF document

http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.2487
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)18-27
JournalCognition
Volume151
Issue number6
Early online date27 Feb 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2016

Abstract

Language learners must learn the meanings of many thousands of words, despite those words occurring in complex environments in which infinitely many meanings might be inferred by the learner as a word’s true meaning. This problem of infinite referential uncertainty is often attributed to Willard Van Orman Quine. We provide a mathematical formalisation of an ideal cross-situational learner attempting to learn under infinite referential uncertainty, and identify conditions under which word learning is possible. As Quine’s intuitions suggest, learning under infinite uncertainty is in fact possible, provided that learners have some means of ranking candidate word meanings in terms of their plausibility; furthermore, our analysis shows that this ranking could in fact be exceedingly weak, implying that constraints which allow learners to infer the plausibility of candidate word meanings could themselves be weak. This approach lifts the burden of explanation from ‘smart’ word learning constraints in learners, and suggests a programme of research into weak, unreliable, probabilistic constraints on the inference of word meaning in real word learners.

    Research areas

  • word learning, cross-situational learning, Quine's problem

Download statistics

No data available

ID: 19556036